June 13, 2025 – Brittany Courville Publicly Associates Bryan Kuchar with Protest Infiltrators
On June 13, 2025, Brittany Courville made two public replies on Twitter (X) directly associating me with a controversial individual accused of infiltrating protest movements. Without any factual basis, she implied a connection between me and a man identified as a January 6 supporter, suggesting a familial relationship and comparing our behavior. These comments were made publicly and in reply to a viral tweet, amplifying the defamatory implication.
This appears to be another example of Brittany’s ongoing campaign to mischaracterize me publicly and discredit my reputation. Her tweets implied political extremism and dangerous behavior, leveraging sarcasm to plant defamatory associations without evidence.
Tweets:
These tweets are included solely for evidentiary documentation and timeline preservation.
“Reminds me of Bryan Kuchar in my personal opinion.”
“Is this Bryan Scott Kuchar’s cousin? Inquiring minds want to know.”
Relevant Legal Considerations:
- Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652E – False Light (recognized in NJ)
Falsely implying an association with fringe political activity or extremist individuals can constitute false light invasion of privacy if the implication would be offensive to a reasonable person. - N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 – Cyber Harassment
The use of suggestive, inflammatory comparisons on social media to imply criminality or political extremism without basis may qualify as cyber harassment depending on intent and impact.
Screenshot of June 13, 2025 Tweet (in case removed):
All audio, documents, images, quotes, screenshots, and videos are presented for documentation and public interest under fair use. This post also serves as part of an ongoing evidentiary record and may be referenced in future legal proceedings if warranted.
