May 9, 2025 – Brittany Courville Alleges I Was “Paid Off” Using Britney Spears’ Money

On May 9, 2025, Brittany Courville (That Surprise Witness, J.D.) publicly alleged that I was paid off using Britney Spears’ money, referencing a claim supposedly made by Britney’s attorney about Lou Taylor. In doing so, she asserted that I, an “alleged fan,” had received money improperly. This inflammatory statement falsely implies financial impropriety and damages my reputation by linking me to misconduct in celebrity legal disputes—without evidence or legal basis.

Courville made this allegation in a tweet referencing a Rule 11 sanctions filing in the Richard v. Combs et al. lawsuit. Her tweet falsely and maliciously inserted my name into a legal controversy to imply I was financially benefiting from a corrupt or unethical scheme. No factual basis has ever been provided to support her assertion that I received funds from Britney Spears, Lou Taylor, or Tri Star Sports & Entertainment.

Tweet:

Lou Taylor squawking in court years after being accused by Britney Spears’ attorney of USING BRITNEY’S MONEY to pay off Bryan Scott Kuchar, an alleged fan. ($$$)

Also after tri star was brought up in Lil Rod Jones lawsuit.

Now getting sued by dawn richard! https://t.co/8kmqNQTgaT

— That Surprise Witness, J.D. (@SurpriseWitnes) May 9, 2025

This tweet is included solely for timeline and evidentiary documentation purposes.

“Lou Taylor squawking in court years after being accused by Britney Spears’ attorney of USING BRITNEY’S MONEY to pay off Bryan Scott Kuchar, an alleged fan. ($$$)”

Relevant Legal Considerations:

• Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652E – False Light (recognized in NJ)
  
  Falsely implying that I accepted improper funds or was paid off in a celebrity legal scandal constitutes a false light invasion of privacy if it would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.
• N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 – Cyber Harassment
  
  Publicly accusing someone of financial misconduct in a high-profile matter, without factual support and in a clearly defamatory tone, may be cyber harassment depending on motive and intent.

Screenshot of May 9, 2025 Tweet (in case removed):

Diddy Docket Tweet/X Images:

All audio, documents, images, quotes, screenshots, and videos are presented for documentation and public interest under fair use. This post also serves as part of an ongoing evidentiary record and may be referenced in future legal proceedings if warranted.