September 4, 2024 – Brittany Courville Claims Bryan Scott Kuchar’s Restraining Order Attempt Was Fraudulent and Dismissed
On September 4, 2024, Brittany Courville posted a tweet and extended thread accusing me, Bryan Scott Kuchar, of filing a “phony fraudulent attempt” at a restraining order in Georgia. She further mocked a third party who appeared to support me during the hearing and declared the effort “dismissed.”
Specific Tweet:
“She also teamed up w/ another person, Bryan Scott Kuchar, in his phony fraudulent attempt at a restraining order in Georgia. She sat on Zoom in court all day to be a ‘witness’ for him. Guess what? That one was dismissed too! 🙂 TURNS OUT, speaking publicly about public records is still allowed!”
Full Thread:
Click here to view the full thread
Contrary to Brittany’s tweet, the restraining order was not “fraudulent.” It was filed lawfully and heard in a Georgia court. The hearing was public and held via Zoom. Brittany personally invited between 10 to 15 followers to attend, some of whom had previously posted hostile or harassing content about me.
Lima Jevremovic attended virtually as a support witness and remained present throughout the hearing. She had also submitted a declaration in her own California restraining order case against Brittany (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. NF013183), describing similar harassment and online targeting.
Myra Ceja of Down the Rabbit Hole News was among those who appeared in the Zoom gallery. When asked by the judge to identify herself, she nervously stated she was attending “as a member of the public.” Myra later posted several videos about my filing, and her online behavior appeared aligned with Brittany’s narrative.
Relevant Legal Considerations:
- Restatement (Second) of Torts § 652E – False Light
Labeling a lawful court filing as “fraudulent” or mocking a party’s use of the legal system, particularly in front of an audience, may rise to the level of false light representation if it distorts legal reality. - N.J.S.A. 2C:33-4.1 – Cyber-Harassment
Publicly encouraging ridicule of someone’s legal claims or mocking witness participation may be considered harassment when done with the intent to alarm or shame.
Screenshot of September 4, 2024 Tweet (in case removed):
This record is preserved for transparency and accurate timeline documentation. Public records, filings, and statements are provided for evidentiary and contextual reference only.
